Substance Over Spin

Despite all of the metrics and data at our fingertips these days, public relations is still more art than science when it comes to attaining the ultimate goal: media coverage.

Sure, reports that show impact after the fact are indispensable and all the information at our fingertips has made the task of gathering this analysis much more comprehensive. The number of unique visitors per month (UVM) to news sites, conversion rates, click-throughs, etc. are all important. But what it is measuring and analyzing is the media placement the PR team has earned.

When it comes to media outreach, it is all about the intangible ability of the PR specialist to communicate a story, pull someone in, and generate enough interest that the journalist wants to learn more. There is no algorithm or artificial intelligence that has cracked that code.

In the media relations world, you need to master subtlety, conciseness, creativity, patience, and common sense. Who are the reporters you are contacting? What is their preferred method of being contacted? What’s their beat? What have they written about recently?

Yes, we have tools that make this research much easier than it used to be. Honestly, I can’t imagine doing this job 40 years ago. The legwork had to have been exhausting. But, when it comes down to it, you are the one making the connection and, hopefully, securing the interview and/or placement.

As any PR vet will tell you, there is one thing serious reporters hate: spin. It’s an easy trap to fall into. The cliché among reporters is that anyone contacting them on behalf of a company, be it for a thought leadership article or an interview, is trying to use them as a mouthpiece for the company, product or executive they represent.

While your job is certainly to raise awareness for your client, you cannot be a part of their sales team. You are telling their story and demonstrating what makes them relevant and interesting. Members of the media will automatically roll their eyes at hyperbole, spin and overt self-promotion.

During my years in PR, I have seen examples of this plenty of times. You work with a client who insists on promoting a product launch to a reporter at a national publication, who inevitably responds (if they respond at all) with one word: “pass.”

The same goes for thought leadership. If you offer an interview by saying, “Ms. XYZ can talk to you about how their widget is revolutionizing the world of widgetry,” any reporter worth their salt will hit delete immediately.

If you say, “The world of widgetry has faced a multitude of issues during the past year due to end users dealing with (for example) data breaches. Ms. XYZ can offer concrete steps these companies can take to become more secure,” now they’re listening. If you can recruit one or two of your client’s customers to attest to the effectiveness of this approach, it drastically increases your chance of garnering interest from the media. 

When it comes to byline articles and op-eds, the same rules apply. If Ms. XYZ writes a piece littered with references to how great her company and its solutions are, it’s not going to fly with most publications from trades to large national publications. I have seen self-promotional op-eds turned down many times. I have also seen them rewritten with the self-promotion removed, and that same publication reversing course and running the article.  

This is all a balancing act. You have to meet the journalist’s standards and the client’s expectations at the same time. For both, it comes down to clear and honest communication.

You need to be armed with the reasons a reporter should be interested in your pitch, and you need to make sure your client understands that issue-driven not product-driven coverage is what will give them credibility in the industry.

Maybe someday companies will be able to enter information into an AI platform that writes the perfect pitch. Human-to-human media relations will become a profession of the past.

But let’s not dwell on that. I don’t want to give Zuckerberg any ideas and I want to keep my job.

The bottom line is we are storytellers, not spinmeisters. It takes nuance and authenticity. If you can pitch substance over spin, the results will speak for themselves.

In 2020, a “Thought Leader” is just a Regular Person

The phrase “thought leader” is one that is thrown around a lot in public relations. And it’s understandable: For any public facing organization or business, it’s important to have experts on hand who can speak to the public.

However, as someone involved in day-to-day media relations operations at an award-winning PR and marketing agency, I have a major gripe with thought leaders, and I wrote this blog specifically for them and their coaches.

In short, my gripe is this: You need to be able to talk about something else other than your products and services. You must be able to speak about something other than your business and your brand.

If you can’t do it, you’re not a thought leader, you’re a spokesman. And there is a difference.

Meet Marc, Human Person

Let’s turn our attention to Marc Benioff, CEO of Salesforce, a cloud computing giant operating out of San Francisco.

Marc founded the company out of his apartment. It has since grown to be a publicly traded technology leader, with a soaring stock value that has catapulted Marc onto the list of American billionaires.

As you can imagine, Marc has appeared in a number of media outlets. In fact, practically every mainstream news outlet you can think of has interviewed him at one point or another.


Sometimes Marc is on Mad Money talking about the latest Salesforce contract. But, more often than not, Marc is sitting down to talk to the media about the issues that were always important to him: homelessness, the changing face of capitalism, the failure of technology companies to support their communities, and how CEOs have an obligation to think about how their companies impact social order.

Much of this can be summed up in an interview he conducted with CNBC early in 2020, where Marc emphasizes “stakeholder return” as being of more value to society than shareholder returns.

Considering federal law mandates all CEOs of publicly traded companies must maximize profits, this is a particularly bold statement. It’s also only one of many that Marc has made over the last decade.


“Capitalism as We Know it is Dead”

What does Marc talking about the issues above have to do with Salesforce? Nothing. But, I bet you’ll remember his name and be curious about what his company does.

Sure, he plugs Salesforce now and then, but mostly Marc talks about his personal views. To back those up, Marc’s non-business philanthropic endeavors match the socioeconomic issues he talks about, culminating in the portrait of a genuine character – or, from a media relations perspective, a genuine thought leader.

Anyone who works in PR or content marketing (or politics for that matter) is aware of the concept of the “soft sell” – an indirect link created between an issue and a person that circles back to what’s being sold. Often this is something crafted deliberately by a media strategist or savvy marketing person.

Even if crafted by a genius, anything crafted is doomed to fail as the world changes. Instead of creating thought leaders, maybe it’s time we task PR professionals with finding them and adding a little bit of polish.

As the economic and government systems in the world evolve, we’re seeing more and more evidence that the public is done with scripted information. In other words, that old “soft sell” carries less weight in 2020 than it did even a few years ago. Sure, the soft sell allows a potential “thought leader” to avoid controversy. But, that’s the problem. You can’t avoid controversy anymore.

Speaking in platitudes and avoiding a conversation about serious issues is a product of the old political and corporate class – a class, I would argue, that is fading rapidly.

I do declare! That is unbecoming of a CEO, good sir!

No one cares. Hate to break it to you, but short of being racist, homophobic, or a closet abuser, no one is judging your lifestyle or personal opinions anymore. And if they are, they’re part of an old guard that is on the way out.

Elon Musk – one of the richest men in the world who may change transportation forever – smoked one of them jazz cigarettes on a comedian’s podcast, where he and host Joe Rogan talked about artificial intelligence conquering all human life.

Other than some fake outrage from the old guard, no one cared. Tesla’s stock is higher than ever, and Elon is still a renowned thought leader, interviewed on a wide variety of topics.

Granted, he does say extremely stupid stuff all the time, but since it’s harmless and he’s just genuinely being himself, the public mostly loves him. And so do his shareholders.

In 2020, thought leaders are people with real ideas who aren’t afraid to be themselves, kind of like Marc Benioff. I don’t know about you, but I would love to sit down with that guy, have a few beers, and talk candidly about how to fix the world’s problems.

Yes, of course Elon is invited, especially since I know how much he and I share a love for video games. It’s BYOB around here though, Elon. I’m not made of money.

Tl;Dr

If you want to craft a thought leader to garner media interviews, don’t craft them at all. Instead, start just by encouraging them to be themselves.

Encourage them to talk about the issues that are important to them, even if they have absolutely nothing to do with the business they’re in. Lastly, tell them not to be afraid to let their personality shine.

If they’re smart, genuine, and have unique ideas, they’ll be a hit. The new public values people, not corporate magnates.

5 Reasons to Invest in Your Future, Despite the Scary Past

Welcome to Q3, 2020. What does that mean for how public relations and marketing departments will invest in their futures?

Q4 will be the time to finalize budgets for 2021. After a tumultuous year including a pandemic, record unemployment, civil unrest and a to-be-determined presidential election, not to mention murder hornets and whatever else the universe chooses to throw against us this year, 2021 may be a welcome sight. But with the roller coaster year we’ve had, faith in budgets may not be so faithful.

Investors will tell you that when the stock market plummets, don’t stress out thinking you’ve lost a fortune. Instead, remind yourself that stocks are now on sale. Buy while prices are at their lowest.

Channeling money back into your business is solid advice any time but especially after a difficult year. Here are five reasons why hiring a public relations firm could be the wisest decision to help you make up for lost revenue.

  1. Pay the pros, not the employees. Even in the healthcare world during a pandemic, health-related jobs are not secure. If your company had to reduce its staff, it’s likely support personnel including social media teams and internal communications managers may have been the first people to go. Hiring a PR firm, however, comes with all these specialists, and so many more. Fully staffed agencies have writers, SEO and content marketing pros, just to name a few, and you won’t have to pay for their unemployment insurance, 401K contributions, or health insurance premiums.
  1. Investors aren’t. This June article from MobiHealthNews points out that in these uncertain times, investors aren’t investing, especially in startups. Smaller companies must find other ways to get their message out, and their brand recognized until they can score a big influx of cash. An agency with a proven track record is the safest option for small companies with limited resources.
  1. The press release is still king. In this blog recently contributed by my colleague, Brandon Glenn, most journalists (36%) still receive their news from the good old press release. A PR firm will staff writers to get your message out there, and better still, leverage it to your target audience. And what about news wire prices? Agencies negotiate rock-bottom deals because of the number of releases they send each year, which means that’s one less contract you have to maintain. The perfect agency will also understand your niche market, so its messaging is on-point, saving you valuable time on revisions and re-reads.
  1. Full service or customized options. The perfect agency is also one that is full service, meaning it’s a one-stop-shop for everything from social media to revamping your website. However, if you don’t have the budget or need for all services, ask for customized options to fill the gaps in your internal marketing department. Perhaps you have a great handle on social media, but your website or collateral material is outdated. Or maybe you want to launch a new product. A great PR firm will offer guidance on how to best utilize the money in your budget.
  1. Uncertainty of in-person events. If there’s one thing 2020 taught us, it’s not to count on a sure thing. For the first time in 58 years, the HIMSS Annual Conference was canceled. Much to the dismay of exhibitors, HIMSS didn’t handle the monetary situation very well. Many exhibitors slated for 2020 are trying to decide if they are going to boycott in 2021. No matter your opinion on this topic, the fact is in-person events may not be happening, at least with the same attendance levels, as they have in past years. While ROI on virtual events is showing improvement, it’s even more important to consider all your options when trying to fill your sales pipeline. Having a good, established agency that specializes in your market, and who has a lot of experience and many solutions, will be important for moving forward post-COVID-19.

We may all be happy to see 2020 in the rearview mirror. But let’s not be afraid of 2021 and the opportunities it has to offer.

My brother, who is a locksmith, knows one simple truth; the months he advertises are the months his phone rings. A full-service public relations agency will know how to guide you, and help you get the most bang for your buck. Invest in your future!

Avoiding the Information “Tug-of-War” During Product Launch

Here’s the scenario. A new product or solution has been developed. Sales and marketing — because they have tangible goals that must be met in a certain timeframe — want to rush out the product launch so they can start selling it.

However, other departments within the organization — such as legal and finance — may take a more cautious approach. Legal doesn’t want to get the word out too quickly because there are too many items that need to be checked off the list first, such as the accuracy of competitive intelligence and any contractual obligations about promotions and sales. Finance wants to make sure that the pricing structure and cost of the product or solution are “just right,” and they need to make sure that future projections are accurate for budgeting and planning.

Working in corporate public relations, and marketing communications specifically, we’ve seen the push and pull between product development, marketing, finance and legal departments over when and how much information to give the general public and captive audiences. We’ve even witnessed arguments — in person and over email — about how much information should be released and how fast.

Here’s what an abbreviated conversation looks like.

Sales: “When is that product going to be ready, we need to start selling immediately!”

Marketing: “All promotions are ready to go. We’ve told Sales that they can start selling next week.”

Finance: “Hold on. What’s the pricing structure and do you have buyers willing to pay for it? If so, how many buyers do you have? And have all promotions and pricing been approved by Legal?”

Legal: “Who approved all of the promotions? We don’t have any contracts that are ready to be presented to customers.”

CEO: “Everyone stop. We need to get our strategy and information aligned before we make any entry into the market with this new product.”

Determining the who and the when

Look at developing marketing communications and the release of information in terms of three phases: product development, product launch, and post-launch.

During the product development phase, there should be several departments at the table. This would include product, marketing and legal, with executive oversight. Product is there to determine the path forward, timing and development efforts. Marketing is at the table to help with competitive intelligence and potential messaging as the product goes through testing. Legal is there to cross check the accuracy and legitimacy of competitive intelligence, as well as the claims about the new product that can and cannot be made. And the executive provides oversight to make sure everything runs smoothly and that the appropriate individuals are held accountable for their team’s efforts.

Preparing for product launch

As we approach the product launch phase — and because everyone has been working in tandem rather than in their silos — information starts to get approval and a go-to-market strategy starts to unfold. Based on testing, product is working out the final details before launch.

However, this is where things could get complicated for marketing and communications. By this point marketing has probably finalized the product name, gotten the legal approvals and trademarked or registered it. But what are we going to say about the product in order to promote it effectively, yet not tip our hand to our competitors? What remains proprietary and what can be shared? If we share too much — or if we say too little — our competitors will seize on it.

This is where marketing and legal engage in a very fine dance — with marketing getting creative and legal providing the checks and balances.

Marketing and its copywriters should begin carefully crafting the messages that were uncovered during the product development phase, and pressure-test them with confidential audiences. Here, the audience reacts to certain emotions and feelings elicited by the actual text, and copywriters can refine messaging based on those reactions. Some messages will get axed, some will get nuanced and some will be born.

After the messages have been created, then bring in the visuals that will align with those feelings and emotions that were uncovered. The visuals can be used for the collateral, website, presentations and any other materials that will be produced.

During the pre-launch phase, legal is also approving the messaging, making sure that all claims are factual, nothing crosses the line, and most importantly, that not too much information will make its way into the public domain. Legal can also help determine the intellectual property (IP) that can be shared with the general population as well as what IP can be shared with the target buyers.

With marketing and legal working as allied forces — rather than opposing forces — the whole product launch will be much easier. And, when materials are presented to sales — after they’ve been fully vetted — a lot of heartburn will have been avoided because sales will have clear parameters about what they can and cannot claim about the product.

Before product launch, marketing should be working with finance and sales as well. Together, they will need to work out product pricing, target audiences, actual buyers and projections. Sales will be determining realistic goals and anticipating the product launch date, and finance will have a detailed understanding of projected revenue.

Now that everything has been worked out and all systems are set, the product can be launched. Having worked together in unity, hopefully, all systems are a go and the information tug-of-war can be avoided — or at least made easier — and the post-launch phase is merely a matter of assessments and simple adjustments to ensure customer satisfaction.

The conversations should then be something like this.

Sales: “We’re ready.”

Marketing: “You have what you need.”

Legal & Finance: “We’re good. Good luck!”

CEO: “Good job, everyone.”

Blinders Off: The Value of Performing a Marketing Audit

One of the late George Carlin’s most famous comedy bits was his list of oxymorons, or as he put it words that don’t go together with other words. He used examples such as ‘jumbo shrimp’, ‘exact estimate’ and ‘military intelligence’ to make his point.

There is one more phrase I’d like to add to the list: honest self-evaluation. Pulling off the blinders and seeing ourselves as we really are is one of the most difficult things in the world to do.

We all think we sing a little better than we do (especially after a couple of cocktails), or look better in that dress designed for models who are built like coat hangers, or can decorate our homes as well as Martha Stewart. That’s the way our brains are wired, to make us feel good about ourselves so we can get on with our daily lives instead of curling up into a little ball in the corner as tears of inadequacy roll down our cheeks with only our ever-adoring dogs giving us comfort.

The same is true in business. We often see our PR and marketing programs the way we want to see them instead of the way they really are. There’s nothing like a little confirmation bias to help us avoid the ugly truth.

But just because you believe something doesn’t make it true. That’s why it often helps to bring in another set of eyes to perform a PR and marketing audit of your integrated program. As my recent blog post from the Forbes Agency Council points out, an impartial third party “one that had nothing to do with developing or executing the current program” can often help you see what you’re actually doing well and shore up any areas you might have missed.

An in-depth audit of your integrated marketing program will typically look into nine areas:

  • Current messaging
  • Share of voice/sentiment versus competitors
  • Media targets and their value
  • Overall content strategy
  • Existing byline articles and case studies
  • Press releases
  • Speaker and award targets
  • Speaker and award applications
  • Social media strategies and posts

To learn more, be sure to read the full post here. Oh, and be sure to tune up that singing voice. Karaoke night is coming up soon.